Report to
Faculty Senate on the addition of a Longevity Bump
Submitted by
The Promotion, Tenure and Salary Committee
April 24, 2008
Charge: Investigate and make recommendations for the addition of a "longevity bump" as a method to formally address salary compression issues.
There has been an impression that starting salaries are rising faster than pay raises. To investigate this more thoroughly, we obtained data from Human Resources for all tenure track faculty on their year of hire, year of last promotion, starting salary and current salary. Data was coded with Appt ID, so no individuals were identified. Current salaries were plotted vs. year hired and promoted, and sorted by rank and college. The slopes of the lines represent changes in salary per year, and were compared with changes in starting salary per year for each college. The results are shown in Table 1, and the general trend is that starting salaries have increased faster than pay raises. Starting salaries of newly hired assistant professors are projected to surpass those of recently promoted associate professors within approximately the next five years, and recently promoted full professors within approximately the next ten years (Table 2). An across the board longevity bump would cost between $500,000 to $2,000,000 per year (Table 3).
Recommendation:
Because of this, the committee felt there was compelling evidence to support a longevity bump to Full and Associate Professors based on the year they were hired. We are fully aware that this could probably not be accomplished in a single year as the cost would be in the 1-2 million dollar range if it were applied in an "across the board" manner. Another option would be to gradually phase the bump in over a 3,5, or 7 year timeframe. The bump could be linked to departmental merit, promotion, positive post-tenure reviews or perhaps any combination within those three areas. The committee further felt that any bump in salary should not come at the expense of any annual pay increase that might apply to the rest of the UW-L faculty in any given year.
Table 1. Changes in salary per year
|
|
CBA |
CLS |
SAH |
|
Starting Salary* |
$2,063 n=20/33 |
$950 n=92/117 |
$1,138 n=84/115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prof: Current Salary vs. year hired |
-$477 |
$655 |
$560 |
|
Prof: Current Salary vs. year promoted |
-$293 |
$1,057 |
$580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assoc: Current Salary vs. year hired |
$402 |
$584 |
$485 |
|
Assoc: Current Salary vs. year promoted |
$175 |
$623 |
$514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst: Current Salary vs. year hired/promoted |
$2,720 |
$35 |
$270 |
*Starting salary data was not available for all faculty. (n=# faculty with starting salary data/# faculty in college)
Table 2. Projected crossing dates.
|
|
CBA |
CLS |
SAH |
|
Projected year where salary of newly hired assistant professor and newly promoted professor are equal |
2017 |
2012 |
2016 |
|
Projected year where salary of newly hired assistant professor and newly promoted associate professor are equal |
2006 |
2010 |
2011 |
Table 3. Annual costs of an across the board longevity bump
|
|
CBA |
CLS |
SAH |
UWL Total |
|
Professors only, by year hired |
$693,964 |
$239,632 |
$399,481 |
$1,333,077 |
|
Professors only, by year promoted |
$327,484 |
0 |
$196,974 |
$524,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associates only, by year hired |
$296,489 |
$191,758 |
$316,117 |
$804,364 |
|
Associates only, by year promoted |
$232,224 |
$98,427 |
$170,352 |
$501,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prof and Assoc, by year hired |
$990,453 |
$431,390 |
$715,598 |
$2,137,441 |
|
Prof and Assoc, by year promoted |
$559,708 |
$51,561 |
$367,326 |
$1,025,471 |