Articles dealing with Third Party Intervention in Disputes: Mediation, Arbitration, & Conflict Management
Ross, W. H., & Chen, J. V. (2007, Summer). Labor Arbitrators Consider HIPAA:
Guidance for Health Care Managers. Labor Law Journal, 58, (2), 117 – 130.Ross, W. H. (2006). Should "Night Baseball" Arbitration be used in lieu of Public-Sector Strikes? Psychological Considerations and
Suggestions for Research. Journal of Collective Negotiations in the Public Sector, 31, (1), 45-70.
Ross, W. H. (2002). The impact of hybrid dispute resolution procedures on constituent fairness judgments.
Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 1151-1188. (Co-authored)
mediation and arbitration. Academy of Management Review, 25
416-427.
Ross, W. H. (2000). Measuring success in mediation. Mediation Journal, 1, 1-16.
Interpersonal Factors in Dispute Mediation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 664-707. (Co-authored)
disputant fairness judgments and supervisory evaluations. International Journal of Conflict Management, 8, 5-37.
A literature review. International Journal of Conflict Management, 7, 314-360. (Co-authored)
strategy in a simulated organizational dispute. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 228-248. (Co-authored)
negotiation: The surface value of a compromise. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24,1084-1113.
outcome perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 280-290.
'Dealmakers' model. International Journal of Conflict Management, 3, 319-341. (Co-authored)
third party intervention on negotiator fairness judgments. The International Journal of
Conflict Management, 3, 207-221.
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 26, 111-118.
and deadline certainty on negotiator behavior. Group and Organization Studies, 15, 105-124.
Note: This list only contains articles. For relevant cases and book chapters, please see the list of publications organized chronologically.
Articles dealing with Human Resource Management, Labor & Employment Relations, and Bargaining
Articles dealing with Electronic Monitoring
Articles dealing with Procedural Justice Issues