International Education Committee
Meeting Minutes for April 30, 2004
331 Cartwright Center
Present: D. Kuderer (Chair), Nancy Navar, Jenny Hill (Student Association Representative), Patricia Nelson, Jeff Bryan, Georges Cravins, Ashley Burrowes, April Handtke (Academic Staff Representative), Kent Koppelman, Eric Kraemer (INS, Consultant), Lisa Swayhoover (OIE, Consultant)
Excused: S. N. Rajagopal
Guest: Jodie Wagner (Counseling Center and CSAA faculty)
Some discussion occurred concerning the “re-entry” of UW-L students after their study abroad. One suggestion to facilitate this included having Jay L. or Eric K. send a memo to department chairs each fall, informing them of the importance of acknowledging a student’s re-entry after study abroad. Although an extended discussion occurred here, other methods for assisting with re-entry are recorded under the INS report later in the meeting.
4.1 It is difficult to expand international efforts when UW-L lost 6.9% of its faculty last year. Other campuses such as UW-River Falls are expanding their international emphasis and are even looking to get an international studies major approved in the future.
4.2 Some of the UW-L faculty searches might consider a faculty member’s willingness to pursue international involvement.
4.3 INS 250 (pre-international), INS 251 (during international experience), and INS 252 (after international experience) are courses that will meet general education requirements beginning Fall, 2004. This is positive progress.
4.4
The Provost will be forming a Task Force on Academic Initiatives on
International Education. In general, this ad hoc task force will focus on
delineating student choices, seeking grants, and exporting course work
internationally. The INS office recommends that any recommendations coming from
this task force still go through the appropriate UW-L governance structures
(International Education Committee, Office of International Studies,
Undergraduate Curriculum Committees, etc.).
M/S/P The IEC requests that recommendations generated by the Task Force be forwarded to the IEC for approval.
The members of the IEC believe that continuity between the two related groups (Task Force and IEC) is very important if progress is to be made.
Respectfully submitted,
Nancy Navar