University of Wisconsin-La Crosse

Institutional Review Board for the Protection of Human Subjects

 

Operating Guidelines and Organizational Policies

 

 

I.                    PURPOSE OF THE BOARD

 

A.      The UW-La Crosse Institutional Review Board for the Protection of Human Subjects (IRB) is responsible for protecting the rights and welfare of human subjects participating in research projects. The Board exercises its review and approval functions to ensure the safe, fair, and ethical treatment of persons serving as research subjects and to ensure that the University and its researchers adhere to appropriate standards of conduct in their pursuit of knowledge and understanding.

 

 

II.                  STATUTORY AUTHORITY OF THE BOARD

 

A.   Title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 46 (45 CFR 46) implements amendments to the Public Health Service Act (Public Law 99-158), effective 19 August 1991, that require all institutions engaged in research involving human subjects to establish an IRB.

 

B.     The Chancellor, as the chief executive officer of the University, is responsible for ensuring that the UW-La Crosse IRB operates in accordance with all applicable laws. The Chancellor has designated the Provost/Vice Chancellor to monitor the operation of the IRB and to appoint its membership.

 

 

III.                REVIEW POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

 

A.      The Board shall establish policies and procedures for the review of research projects involving human subjects and shall disseminate these broadly and regularly to all appropriate faculty, staff, and students at the University. The Board shall issue (and update as needed) a concise brochure that provides An Overview of Policies and Procedures and a substantive booklet, A Researcher's Guide for Submission of Protocols to the IRB, that includes required review procedures and forms. These documents will be available both in print and electronic formats through the UW-L Office of Sponsored Research, Scholarly and Creative Activities.

 

 

IV.                MEMBERSHIP OF THE BOARD

 

A.      Federal law requires that each IRB shall have at least five (5) members who possess sufficient expertise, experience, and breadth of knowledge to provide complete and adequate review of research activities commonly conducted at the institution. The IRB membership must have professional competence necessary to review specific research activities, as well as knowledge of institutional regulations and commitments, applicable law, and standards of professional conduct and practice.

 

B.     The law further requires that each IRB shall include the following types of individuals in its membership:

 

1.      At least one member of the Board must have primary professional expertise in scientific areas.

 

2.      At least one other member of the Board must have primary professional expertise in nonscientific areas.

 

3.      At least one member of the Board must not be otherwise affiliated with the institution, including having a member of the immediate family of a person who is affiliated with the institution.  This member is referred to as the community representative.

 

C.     The law also instructs that the Board shall seek to include qualified persons of both genders. The Board may not consist entirely of members from a single disciplinary profession.

 

D.     The UW-La Crosse IRB will consist of not less than ten (10) and not more than fifteen (15) full voting members who are appointed by the Provost/Vice Chancellor with the concurrence of the Chancellor.

 

E.     The membership shall include at least one (1) representative from each of the following units of the University:

 

1.      College of Science and Health

2.      College of Business Administration

3.      College of Liberal Studies

 

F.      To the extent possible, one voting member of the Board should be a student who will be appointed by the Provost/Vice Chancellor for one year. The same student may be reappointed for a successive term.

 

G.  All members of the Board (with the exception of the community member(s) designated in Section IV.B.3 and IV.F above) must be members of the faculty and/or academic staff of UW-La Crosse.

 

Term of Appointment:

 

H.     Each voting member of the Board will serve for a three-year term (with the exception of a student member in Section IV. F). Appointments to the IRB shall be staggered in rotation, such that no more than one-third of the Board should be appointed every year.

 

I.         The Provost/Vice Chancellor may reappoint any member for a second term.

 

J.       Ordinarily, no voting member, including the community member, may serve for more than six (6) consecutive years. However, under extenuating circumstances, the Provost/Vice Chancellor may allow an extension beyond the six consecutive years.

 

Permanent and Ex-Officio Members and Ad Hoc Consultants:

 

K.     The Board shall elect a Chair from among its faculty membership who will serve as a voting member of the full board only in the event of a tied decision. The chair shall be elected at the first meeting of the IRB in the Spring Semester or immediately thereafter. The elected Chair shall begin her or his term in the first meeting of the following Fall Semester, and shall serve a one-year term.  This individual may be re-elected for a period commensurate with his or her term of appointment (see above, Items H, I and J).

 

L.      The Provost/Vice Chancellor shall appoint an IRB Coordinator for a period of 1-3 years.  Ordinarily the IRB Coordinator shall be a member of faculty and/or academic staff at UW-L who has earned a minimum of a baccalaureate degree, has a minimum of three years experience as a member of IRB, and has sound knowledge and understanding of the Federal Guidelines relating to the Protection of Human Subjects.

 

M.  The Coordinator shall serve as an ex-officio voting member of the full Board as well as the Executive Committee of the IRB.  The Coordinator shall review all protocols and approve unless it is determined that the protocol warrants an in-depth review by the executive committee or the full board. The Coordinator will work very closely with the elected IRB Chair in making decisions about a protocol needing in-depth review by the executive committee of the full board.

 

N.  The Coordinator shall report directly to the Associate Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs, who shall serve as a permanent, nonvoting (ex officio) member and consultant to the Board, and shall be referred to as the “IRB Administrator.”

 

O.    In accordance with 45 CFR Section 46.107(f), the Board may, at its discretion, invite individuals with specialized expertise to participate in its sessions as nonvoting (ad hoc) consultants.

 

 

V.                  MEETINGS

 

The IRB Chair is responsible for convening the Board according to an established regular schedule that permits researchers to have their projects reviewed in a timely manner. The full membership of the Board shall meet at least one (1) time during the calendar year.

 

A.   A majority of the full appointed voting membership shall constitute a quorum for the purpose of holding an official meeting. A majority of those voting members present at an official meeting shall be sufficient to issue official verdicts, actions, and judgments.

 

B.     All meetings shall be conducted in accordance with the state of Wisconsin's Open Meetings Law and any other appropriate state and/or federal regulations governing the operation of this public Board.

 

 

VI.                EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD

 

A.      The Provost/Vice Chancellor with the concurrence of IRB shall appoint an Executive Committee, which will include the IRB Coordinator and Chair of the Board, to conduct IRB responsibilities between the regular meetings of the full Board. The Executive Committee must report its actions to the full Board at the next scheduled meeting of the IRB, and the minutes of Executive Committee meetings will be sent in timely fashion to all Board members.  The Full IRB Board retains the authority to review, reverse, modify, or void any decision or action of the Executive Committee.

 

B.     A principal responsibility of the Executive Committee is to conduct expedited reviews of projects involving no more than minimal risk, as specified in 45 CFR Section 46.110. Only the full IRB has authority to disapprove research activities.

 

C.     The Executive Committee may consist of not more than two-thirds of the full Board's voting membership and must include a representative from each of the units designated in Section IV E above. Executive Committee appointments are for one (1) year but may be renewed annually within the term limitations outlined in Section IV H, I, and J above.

 

D.     The Chair of the IRB will serve as a voting member and Chair of the Executive Committee. The Associate Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs will serve as a non-voting member and consultant to the Executive Committee.

 

 

VII.              CONFLICT OF INTEREST PROCEDURES

 

A.   Any member of the Board who has an actual or apparent conflict of interest in the initial or continuing review of a research project may not participate in the Board's deliberations or voting (except to provide general or specialized information that may be requested by the IRB).

 

B.   It is the responsibility of the individual Board member to identify a conflict of interest and remove him/herself voluntarily by informing the IRB Chair.  The specific nature of the conflict of interest need not be revealed.

 

C.     If someone believes that there is an actual or apparent conflict of interest in the participation of an IRB member in a particular case, and that person has not removed him/herself from the proceedings, a challenge may be raised either by a member(s) of the Board or by the researcher(s) whose project is under review.  A conflict of interest challenge must be raised prior to the Board's action on the project and takes immediate precedence as a point of order during an official meeting.

 

 

VIII.            INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW

 

A.   As provided in 45 CFR Section 46.112, affirmative decision of the IRB may be subject to further review by University officials. The Provost/Vice Chancellor and the Chancellor may, at their discretion, conduct additional, independent inquiry into a decision of the IRB and may, if their findings so warrant, disapprove a research project previously authorized by the IRB.

 

B.     In no case may the Provost/Vice Chancellor or Chancellor approve a research project that the IRB has previously disapproved.

 

 

Operating Guidelines and Organizational Policies of the UW-La Crosse Institutional Review Board adopted 17 March 1998 and revised 31 January, 2000; 1 September 2004; 1 January 2005; 3 February 2006; 4 August 2006 and 1 May 2007.

 

 

 

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               

Associate Vice Chancellor                                                Provost and Vice Chancellor                                             UW-L Chancellor

for Academic Affairs                                                            for Academic Affairs