Program planning and review
The following standing committees and their bylaws are created by action of the senate to support its work.
Please refer to the Faculty Senate Articles, Bylaws and Policies for further information regarding the senate and faculty committees.
Meeting minutes are the official record of proceedings and actions taken during committee meetings. Please follow these guidelines for taking meeting minutes for faculty senate meetings. Questions can be directed to the Faculty Senate office at senate@uwlax.edu.
2019-2020 Membership
Rose Brougham
Ann Epstein, Chair
Teresa Helper
Christa Kiersch
James Longhurst, Recorder
Nicholas McGrath
Nicole Ploeger-Lyons
Mary Jane Tollefson
Huya Yan
Click here for previous academic year committee membership, meeting minutes, charge letters, final reports, and committee documents for the Academic Planning Committee.
Undergraduate APR:
2019-2020 Membership
Nilakshi Borah
Whitney George Dregne
Sara Heaser, Recorder
Kari Johnson
Edward Kim, Chair
Bryan Kopp
Terry Lilley Jr.
Christopher McCracken
Gregory Ormes, Convener
Dawn Rouse
Jaclyn Wisinski
Graduate APR:
2019-2020 Membership
Anita Baines, Chair
Bonita Jo Bratina
Naoko Giblin
Seth King
Jocelyn Newton
Victoria Svoboda
Marco Vriens
Click here for previous academic year committee membership, meeting minutes, charge letters, final reports, and committee documents for the Academic Program Review Committees.
2019-2020 Membership
Alan Bigel
Jennifer Docktor, Chair
Ryan Friesen, Recorder
Jennifer Klein
Kenny Hunt
Robert Jecklin
Valeria Stepanova
Berna Gercek Swing
Mary Tollefson
The major tasks of this committee will be two-fold:
- Fall semester: Review program assessment reports and provide feedback to enable continued improvement in the undertaking of quality assessment.
- Spring semester: Review program level assessment plans for academic programs and provide recommendations for plan improvements to department chairs, program directors, and departmental assessment coordinators.
Please note: This committee serves a different purpose than the Academic Program Review (APR) Committee. The distinction between the work of Program Review (APR) and Program Assessment (UPAC) is illustrated below.
PROGRAM EVALUATION (program review). A systematic procedure for collecting, analyzing and using information to answer questions about the extent to which a program is achieving its goals. Typically, it focuses on the effectiveness and efficiency of a program. Assessment of student learning outcomes in the program may be included as one source of information to evaluate the program.
PROGRAM ASSESSMENT (contrast with program evaluation). A systematic procedure for collecting, analyzing and using information about student learning with respect to program-level learning outcomes. Results are used to inform decisions about how to improve student learning in the program.
If you require further information, email the faculty senate office
at senate@uwlax.edu or call 608-785-8018.