Program planning and review
The following standing committees and their bylaws are created by action of the senate to support its work.
Please refer to the Faculty Senate Policies and Articles and Bylaws for further information regarding the senate and faculty committees.
Meeting minutes are the official record of proceedings and actions taken during committee meetings. Please follow these guidelines for taking meeting minutes for faculty senate meetings. Questions can be directed to the Faculty Senate office at senate@uwlax.edu.
2020-2021 Membership
Eric Barnes
Ann Epstein
Kelly Gorres
Teresa Hepler
Jennifer Kosiak
Kristofer Rolfhus
Lindsay Steiner
Mary Jane Tollefson
Marco Vriens
Charge Letter
Click here for previous academic year committee membership, meeting minutes, charge letters, final reports, and committee documents for the Academic Planning Committee.
Undergraduate APR:
2020-2021 Membership
Nilakshi Borah
Elizabeth Brown
Ann Epstein
Sara Heaser
Edward Kim
Janet Kirsch
Bryan Kopp
John May
Christopher McCracken
Heidi Morrison
Gregory Ormes
Charge Letter
Graduate APR:
2020-2021 Membership
Anita Davelos
Naoko Giblin
William Gillespie
Seth King
Jocelyn Newton
Victoria Svoboda
Marco Vriens
Charge Letter
Click here for previous academic year committee membership, meeting minutes, charge letters, final reports, and committee documents for the Academic Program Review Committees.
2020-2021 Membership
Sheida Babakhani Teimouri
Anita Davelos
Ryan Friesen
Berna Gercek Swing
Kenny Hunt
Janet Kirsch
Jennifer Klein
Mary Krizan
Heidi Morrison
Patrick Barlow, Assessment Coordinator
Charge Letter
The major tasks of this committee will be two-fold:
- Fall semester: Review program assessment reports and provide feedback to enable continued improvement in the undertaking of quality assessment.
- Spring semester: Review program level assessment plans for academic programs and provide recommendations for plan improvements to department chairs, program directors, and departmental assessment coordinators.
Please note: This committee serves a different purpose than the Academic Program Review (APR) Committee. The distinction between the work of Program Review (APR) and Program Assessment (UPAC) is illustrated below.
PROGRAM EVALUATION (program review). A systematic procedure for collecting, analyzing and using information to answer questions about the extent to which a program is achieving its goals. Typically, it focuses on the effectiveness and efficiency of a program. Assessment of student learning outcomes in the program may be included as one source of information to evaluate the program.
PROGRAM ASSESSMENT (contrast with program evaluation). A systematic procedure for collecting, analyzing and using information about student learning with respect to program-level learning outcomes. Results are used to inform decisions about how to improve student learning in the program.
If you require further information, email the faculty senate office
at senate@uwlax.edu or call 608-785-8018.