International Research & Collaborations

The UWL Export Controls Screening Survey must be completed by UWL faculty, staff, and students planning to travel internationally. This enables the UWL Export Controls Officer and other offices to assess related export controls risks and requirements, conduct further screening, and provide guidance to ensure compliance with federal regulations. For additional information, see the UWL Export Controls Overview & FAQs KB article.

Traveling with Technology: Using laptops, email, and other technology outside the US can entail elevated risks of data compromise or loss. For best practices to mitigate these risks, refer to the International Cybersecurity KB article for guidance on securing your data and devices while traveling abroad.

Health Concerns: It is recommended that employees check with their health provider well in advance of any international travel to ensure all necessary vaccines are up to date. Be aware if specific vaccines are required/recommended for your destinations these often must be given a month or more before travel.

Students: UWL International Education & Engagement (IEE) provides resources and support for university-sponsored student travel. It is important that student travelers understand university requirements before planning travel. Additionally, it must be remembered that UW System policy requires all students who travel abroad under university sponsorship to enroll in CISI, the university’s medical, health and evacuation insurance. Contact IEE for additional information.

Refer to the International Education & Engagement (IEE) international travel resources for additional guidance.

US export control regulations can include restrictions or prohibitions with whom US researchers can collaborate, share data, exchange research materials, etc. These restrictions can apply to particular international individuals, organizations, and/or countries as well as particular data, information, research materials, technology, equipment, and/or components.

Before work or activities take place with international collaborators, either domestically or abroad, the UWL Export Controls Screening Survey must be completed by UWL faculty, staff, and students planning to perform the work. This includes all planned work with international individual collaborators (faculty, staff, students, or others) or organizations. In addition to research collaborations, this includes planning to share, exchange, transport, or ship data, information, supplies, research materials, or equipment with international individuals or organizations (domestically or abroad, virtually or in-person). Federal export controls regulations include limits on what can be shipped out of the country and to whom it can be shipped, limits on information access for certain foreign nationals and/or organizations, and license requirements for shipping/sharing some items or information abroad. After the survey is completed, the UWL Export Controls Officer and other offices assess related export controls risks and requirements, conduct further screening, and provide guidance to ensure compliance with federal regulations. For additional information, see the UWL Export Controls Overview & FAQs KB article.

Some cooperative research projects may require a dual/joint review between UWL’s Institutional Review Board (IRB) and the other institution’s IRB or appropriate human subjects research authority. One such scenario is human subjects research conducted internationally. It is the responsibility of UWL researchers to know what ethical considerations and legal requirements apply when conducting research abroad. Refer to the federal Office for Human Research Protections’ (OHRP) international resources for general information regarding the country or countries in which you intend to conduct research.

It is strongly recommended that researchers contact the relevant Foreign Embassy or Consulate located in the US to discuss their research plan prior to traveling. They may be able to assist you in obtaining the appropriate type of visa. Some foreign governments will not allow researchers to obtain these visas at customs and may subsequently bar the researcher from entering the country.

• If your research involves an international collaborator(s) or participants in another country, you must contact the International Office of any university sponsoring you, your collaborator(s), and/or your participants (e.g., their student population). For research involving an international co-PI(s), UWL and the international institution must enter into a joint review arrangement OR the UWL-affiliated researcher must provide proof (e.g., email correspondence with a designated official, such as a member of their research office or university leadership) of the international institution’s willingness to rely on UWL’s Institutional Review Board (IRB) for oversight as part of the protocol materials submitted to UWL’s IRB. The UWL Export Control Screening Survey MUST also be completed by you, as the researcher, on behalf of your international collaborators.
• If you have no international collaborators and participants are members of the general public, it is still advisable to contact a local university or organization (e.g., NGOs) that is familiar with the desired participant population so that they can help you identify the ethical regulations that must be observed for your research. NOTE: If university/organization support is required in the location where you intend to conduct research, you must include documentation of their support in your IRB proposal.
• If your research involves indigenous populations in other countries, you must also obtain written permission from their Tribe’s/Nation’s local representatives in ways that are accessible to them (e.g., in their own language, either verbally or written). See the UWL IRB Researcher’s Guide for the Submission of Protocols, Research Involving Indigenous Tribes/First Nations section for more guidance on working with Tribes/Nations, both international and sovereign.

Do not assume that no ethical considerations or legal requirements apply for research in other countries, regardless of their socioeconomic status. Even if your research is not intrusive or clinical in nature, it is always advisable to contact a university/higher educational institution in the relevant country. Best practice may include working with a co-PI from a local university or organization.

Refer to the UWL IRB Researcher’s Guide for the Submission of Protocols and IRB website for more information. Contact the IRB (irb@uwlax.edu, 608.785.8044) with questions.

Laboratories that plan to import or export biological-source research materials should first contact the UWL Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC). Permits from federal agencies in the US are often required for import or export of such materials. Specific language is often required on shipping documentation for incoming items that don’t require an import permit. If laboratories are exporting biological materials, the recipient should verify that they are in compliance with the destination country’s applicable import regulations. In addition, individuals that are shipping biological materials may be required to have a current biological Hazardous Material Shipping certification. Sending or receiving biological research materials also requires a material transfer agreement (MTA) to be established between the institution sending the material and the institution receiving the material. The process for establishing an MTA is outlined on the Assistance with Contracts webpage.

The FBI and other federal law enforcement agencies have increased their surveillance efforts to identify transport of research materials and verify that those exports comply with federal laws. We’re told that these efforts are part of a nation-wide enforcement action to control the transport of biological materials that may present a threat to our national security, or reduce the theft of intellectual property developed in the US, much of it with federal funds.

When sending tangible research materials outside the US, researchers must ensure that the materials are sent out under a material transfer agreement (MTA) between the institution sending the material and the institution receiving the material. Related research compliance requirements (e.g., approved IBC/IACUC/IRB protocols, IP considerations) must be fulfilled before an MTA can be finalized. The process for establishing an MTA is outlined on the Assistance with Contracts webpage.

Generally, laptops, smartphones, and other common devices can be transported or traveled with internationally without restrictions. Individuals should, however, be mindful that using laptops, email, and other technology outside the US can entail elevated risks of data compromise or loss. For best practices to protect sensitive data and mitigate these risks, refer to the International Cybersecurity KB article for guidance on securing your data and devices while traveling abroad.

Specialized research equipment may require special federal licenses or permits. It may also be restricted or prohibited to transport to or travel with in certain countries due to US export control regulations.

The UWL Export Controls Screening Survey must be completed by UWL faculty, staff, and students planning to share, exchange, transport, or ship data, information, supplies, research materials, or equipment with international individuals or organizations (domestically or abroad, virtually or in-person) well in advance of planned activities. Federal export controls regulations include limits on what can be shipped out of the country and to whom it can be shipped, limits on information access for certain foreign nationals and/or organizations, and license requirements for shipping some items or information abroad. After the survey is completed, the UWL Export Controls Officer and other offices assess related export controls risks and requirements, conduct further screening, and provide guidance to ensure compliance with federal regulations.

If a license or permit is required for transporting equipment, it can take several months to apply for and acquire it from the appropriate federal agency. There are often additional costs for acquiring such licenses or permits that should be accounted for when planning research and travel expenses. Individuals should account for this in their research and travel plans and begin the process as early as possible. For additional information, see the UWL Export Controls Overview & FAQs KB article.

Under UW System and university policy, all inventions discovered by faculty, staff, or students on appointment while pursuing their university duties, or on university premises, or with university supplies or equipment must be disclosed to the WiSys Technology Foundation. See UWL Intellectual Property, Inventions, and Patents guidance and UW System Administrative (UWSA) Policy 346: Patents and Inventions. Once an invention is disclosed, UWL's WiSys Regional Associate will conduct an equity review to ensure that the proprietary rights and responsibilities of the university, our personnel, and outside parties are honored. To address IP considerations when working with international collaborators, consult early with ORSP and the WiSys Regional Associate.

See the Assistance with Contracts webpage for guidance. Contact the Office of Research & Sponsored Programs (ORSP) and the Contract Administrator for assistance.  Foreign contracts are subject to federal Section 117 reporting requirements.

Foreign scientists and scholars are a welcome addition to our campus, and the university supports such collaborations. Departments are responsible for verifying the employment eligibility and/or proper US immigration status of their visiting scientists and scholars. Please contact Human Resources for assistance with any immigration or visa-related issues.

Faculty and staff developing non-research-related international agreements, which typically are non-monetary, non-binding documents that formalize an institution-to-institution partnership with a foreign entity (e.g. Memorandum of Understanding), should work closely with the UWL Office of International Education & Engagement (IEE) and Contract Administrator. These partners will help ensure international agreements generate mutual benefit, set realistic expectations, manage risks, adhere to campus, state, and federal policies, and are signed by someone with authority to sign on behalf of the university.

All gifts and gift solicitations with foreign organizations or entities must be disclosed, accepted, and reported in compliance with the UW-La Crosse Foundation's Gift Acceptance and Reporting Guidelines. Foreign gifts are also subject to federal Section 117 reporting requirements.

What are university requirements related to export controls?

The Export Controls Screening Survey must be completed by any UWL faculty, staff, and students planning to carry out activities that involve:

• International travel
• Work with foreign collaborators (faculty, staff, students, or others) or organizations (domestically or abroad)
• Sharing, exchanging, transporting, or shipping information, supplies, research materials, or equipment with foreign individuals or organizations (domestically or abroad, virtually or in person)

After the survey is completed, the UWL Export Controls Officer and other offices assess related export controls risks and requirements, conduct further screening, and provide guidance to ensure compliance with federal regulations. For additional information, see the UWL Export Controls Overview & FAQs KB article.

What are export controls? 

Export controls are federal laws that govern the export of certain items and information out of, into, and within the US in the interests of US national security, economic competitiveness, and foreign policy.  Examples of such controls include limits on what can be shipped out of the country and to whom it can be shipped, limits on information access for certain foreign nationals and/or organizations, and license requirements for shipping some items or information abroad. Export controls can affect: 

• What type of research we do 
• Who we hire 
• Who we can share information with 
• Who we can work with (collaborators/sponsors) 
• Where we ship items 
• What items we ship 
• Level of security for projects/labs

What is defined as an “export?” 

An export is the transfer or disclosure of items, materials, information, software, technology, or other unclassified but restricted data to any person outside the US, including a US citizen abroad.  “Export” means not only the physical shipment of items but also the release of technology to foreign persons within the US by way of visual inspection, oral transmission, or training (“deemed export”). 

What is the definition of a foreign person/organization? 

For the purposes of export control laws, a foreign person/organization is any person/entity who is not a: 

• US citizen
• US permanent resident alien ("green card" holder)
• Protected political asylee/refugee
• US government agency or state/local government
• US business
• US university

What are some red flags signaling export controls could be involved in an activity? 

• A contract, grant, or agreement contains one or more of the following: 
  • Publication restrictions 
  • Personnel restrictions 
  • Export control language 
• Technical information is received under a non-disclosure agreement 
• Shipping items or information abroad 
• Working with foreign collaborators here or abroad 
• International travel 

Which export control regulations are most applicable to university activities? 

Are there exceptions to export control laws for institutions of higher education? 

There are no exceptions to OFAC regulations.  However, generally speaking, the following exclusions to ITAR and/or EAR export control laws can be used by institutions of higher education.  

What are the potential outcomes if an item is determined to be possibly subject to export controls? 

• No additional action may be needed
• Classification of item/technology/information in the USML (ITAR) or CCL (EAR), which determines whether (and how) it is controlled under the regulations
• Development of technology control plan, which describes how it will be managed from a security standpoint and may or may not prevent the need for a license
• Obtaining license from appropriate federal agency if item is determined to be subject to export controls
• Prohibition of activity if it is determined to be prohibited by federal regulations

National Institutes of Health

In August 2018, Dr. Francis Collins issued a letter to grantees and published a Statement on Protecting the Integrity of U.S. Biomedical Research. In these documents, NIH highlighted the following areas of concern:

1. Diversion of intellectual property in grant applications or produced by NIH-supported biomedical research to other entities, including other countries;
2. Sharing of confidential information by peer reviewers with others, including with foreign entities, or otherwise attempting to influence funding decisions; and
3. Failure by some researchers at NIH-funded institutions to disclose substantial contributions of resources from other organizations, including foreign governments, which threatens to distort decisions about the appropriate use of NIH funds.

In July 2019, NIH issued Reminders of NIH Policies on Other Support and on Policies related to Financial Conflicts of Interest and Foreign Components and accompanying FAQs on Other Support and Foreign Components. The NIH’s Advisory Committee to the Director Working Group on Foreign Influences on Research Integrity continues to work to address concerns.

In July 2020, NIH released a website on Protecting U.S. Biomedical Intellectual Innovation. The site describes NIH concerns and requirements for disclosures, as well as explains responsibilities of institutions and the NIH.

National Science Foundation

The National Science Board, in October 2018, issued a Statement of the National Science Board on Security and Science, which emphasizes that “U.S. universities and colleges must help promote scientific openness and integrity and safeguard information that impacts national security and economic competitiveness.” The Director of the NSF released a Dear Colleague Letter on Research Protection in July 2019. NSF also issued a policy that their agency personnel and IPAs may not participate in foreign government talent recruitment programs. NSF commissioned a study and report from JASON on Fundamental Research Security, which proposed steps that NSF can take to improve the security of fundamental research.

Department of Energy

The Department of Energy (DOE) released a Memorandum in January 2019 that contains a policy prohibiting DOE personnel from participating in foreign talent recruitment programs. DOE provided further guidance in Order 486.1 to their employees and contractors.

Department of Defense

The Department of Defense (DoD) issued a Memorandum in March 2019 that delineated information to be provided for senior/key personnel as part of a proposal and that the information would be used for purposes including protection of intellectual property and limiting undue influence. DoD also issued, in October 2019, a letter to universities and research centers describing their efforts to protect the integrity of the U.S. research enterprise and asking for support in doing so.

Office of Science and Technology Policy

In June 2020, OSTP released a presentation on Enhancing the Security and Integrity of America’s Research Enterprise. This presentation highlights some specific cases and areas of ongoing concern. OSTP is working on additional guidance for academic research institutions.

In September 2019, the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy sent a Letter to the United States Research Community in which he emphasizes the importance of protecting the integrity of our nation’s research enterprise.

We expect federal agencies to release further guidance over the coming months, so be aware that information and requirements might change at any time. In the meantime, we encourage faculty and staff to reacquaint themselves with existing policies and procedures. Select information (not a comprehensive list) is included below.

• NIH Research application instructions: https://grants.nih.gov/grants/how-to-apply-application-guide/forms-e/research-forms-e.pdf (see instructions related to international collaborators or foreign component)
• NIH RPPR instructions: https://grants.nih.gov/grants/rppr/; https://grants.nih.gov/sites/default/files/rppr_instruction_guide.pdf (see instructions related to participants affiliated with a foreign organization; award budget being spent in a foreign country; or foreign component)
• NSF proposal instructions on foreign organizations: https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappg20_1/pappg_1.jsp#IE6
• NSF RPPR instructions: https://www.research.gov/common/attachment/Desktop/NSF_RGov_RPPR_ScreenshotsandInstructions.pdf (see instructions related to participants or partner organizations)

Investigators are personally responsible for including in their Current & Pending (Other) Support (or other relevant) sponsored project documents all sources of foreign support consistent with the funding agency's requirements. NIH, in particular, currently states: "Other Support includes all financial resources, whether Federal, non-Federal, commercial or institutional, available in direct support of an individual’s research endeavors, including but not limited to research grants, cooperative agreements, contracts, and/or institutional awards. Training awards, prizes, or gifts do not need to be included.” As noted in NIH director Collins’ letter, there have been instances reported nationally of investigators failing to properly report sources of foreign support for their research. NSF and other agencies have also voiced concern. Failing to report other sources of domestic or foreign support increases the likelihood that the same or closely related research could be funded more than once, and increases the potential for allegations of fraud, as well as overlap in intellectual property obligations to employers and the government. Careful attention to the specific requirements of an individual Funding Opportunity Announcement/FOA is warranted.

Federal sponsor policies:

• NIH: https://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/nihgps/HTML5/section_2/2.5.1_just-in-time_procedures.htm
• NSF: https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappg20_1/pappg_2.jsp#IIC2h
• Dept. of Defense: Memorandum

• NIH: https://grants.nih.gov/grants/forms/biosketch.htm
• NSF: https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappg20_1/pappg_2.jsp#IIC2f

To ensure that any potential conflicts of interest - foreign or domestic - are identified and managed appropriately, faculty/staff applying for federal funding must accurately disclose covered financial and business interests, activities, and support through the Significant Financial Interest (SFI) Disclosure Form in accordance with the Financial Conflicts of Interest (FCOI) policy. For example, faculty/staff must disclose the following interests from any foreign entity in any amount:

• Compensation
• Honoraria
• Paid authorship
• Consulting fees
• Ownership interests
• Investments
• Intellectual property rights and interests
• Royalties
• Reimbursements
• Sponsorships

• NIH: https://grants.nih.gov/policy/research_integrity/confidentiality_peer_review.htm
• Conflicts-of-Interest and Confidentiality Statement for NSF Panelists: https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/forms/nsf1230p.pdf

Investigators involved in the peer review process are expected to follow the stringent confidentiality requirements of proposals undergoing review. NIH director Collins also reported instances (nationally) of study section reviewers inappropriately sharing proposals undergoing peer review with domestic and foreign collaborators.

Though the term “foreign influence” has not been assigned a singular definition by the Federal government, it is described in the NSF JASON report as conduct that “might run counter to the U.S. values of science ethics.” Examples include reward – “offering of material or social goods in exchange for desired behavior”; deception – “providing incomplete, incorrect information on an application, proposal, or publication for the purpose of hiding or directing attention away from some activity”; coercion – “the threat of harm or disadvantage for the purpose of enforcing compliance with a demand”; and theft – “the taking of a physical object or protected idea without permission of the owner.” The Federal government asserts that these unethical means of influence are being used to acquire U.S. science and technology information.

Federal agencies are concerned about issues including diversion of intellectual property produced by federally-sponsored research to foreign entities or governments; sharing of confidential information by peer reviewers with foreign entities; and failure by some researchers to disclose substantial contributions of resources from other organizations. Agencies also question whether incomplete disclosures have resulted in inappropriate funding decisions.

• Providing accurate and complete disclosures about research-related activities and resources
• Ensuring that confidentiality of information, such as grant applications, is preserved
• Including foreign components in grant applications or requesting prior approval for foreign components during the life cycle of the award
  • NIH guidance on domestic grants with foreign components
  • NSF guidance on foreign organizations

While there is no standard definition of a foreign government talent recruitment program across the Federal government, the Department of Energy provided some characteristic information in DOE Order 486.1. Excerpts from the Order include the following:

• Any foreign-state-sponsored attempt to acquire U.S. scientific-funded research or technology through foreign government-run or funded recruitment programs that target scientists, engineers, academics, researchers, and entrepreneurs of all nationalities working or educated in the United States
• Compensation provided by the foreign state to the targeted individual in exchange for the individual transferring their knowledge and expertise to the foreign country…[may take] forms, such as cash, research funding, honorific titles, career advancement opportunities, promised future compensation, or other types of remuneration or consideration
• Recruitment…refers to the foreign-state-sponsor’s active engagement in attracting the targeted individual to join the foreign-sponsored program and transfer their knowledge and expertise to the foreign state. The targeted individual may be employed and located in the U.S., or in the foreign state.
• Of particular concern are those programs that allow for continued employment at U.S. research facilities or receipt of DOE research funds while concurrently receiving compensation from the foreign state.

The United States Senate (2019) issued a report describing concerns that participation in foreign government talent recruitment programs may involve conduct that is contrary to the values of the U.S. research enterprise, which include reciprocity, integrity, merit-based competition, and transparency.

No. Federal agencies and university leadership have expressed the critical importance of international research collaborations. UWL values these collaborations and intends to continue providing a welcoming environment for international scholars and students.

Individuals should contact ORSP to discuss the situation and determine appropriate next steps.

Refer to the funding agency's specific guidance for completing Other/Current and Pending Support documents. Many federal agencies are revising their instructions regarding Other Support. They request similar, though not uniform, information and provide somewhat ambiguous instructions. Given these factors, below are some clarifying statements to standardize and set expectations on what to include in Other/Current and Pending Support documents submitted by UWL.

• Any activity conducted within the scope of an Investigator’s UWL appointment that provides funding or requires a commitment of time must be reported.
  • Commitments are regular obligations of time (part of an investigator’s regular activities), not short-term obligations, such as attending a meeting and making a presentation.
  • If an investigator has a commitment for an activity but is receiving no salary support from the activity (salary is cost shared by the University), that activity must be reported.
  • Typically, activities that provide funding or have a quantifiable commitment of time are Federal or Non-Federal sponsored projects (fund 144 or 133).
  • Even if a research project does not involve a quantifiable commitment of time, if the PI/senior key personnel is spending time on the project, the project should be included.
  • Awards resulting from internally-funded competitions, such as UWL and UW System grants, should be included.
• All collaborations and affiliations that provide funding or require a commitment of time must be reported, whether foreign or domestic.

As appropriate:

• Include the proposal being submitted as a pending proposal.
• Address potential overlap or over-commitments. As this is a primary concern of Federal agencies, please be clear in your explanations.
• List projects with no-cost extensions.
• Update information as much as possible, e.g., remove outdated proposals or expired awards, unless specifically requested by sponsor, such as DoD.

As sponsor guidance may change, pay close attention to the sponsor’s instructions in the request for proposal, policy guide, etc. on how to prepare these documents. Each sponsor may request slightly different information or require that it be provided following their own format.

Investigators and departments should be prepared to respond to a sponsor’s questions about the information provided in Other Support.

It is the investigator's responsibility to ensure the accuracy of Other/Current and Pending Support documents, in accord with the application guidelines or the sponsor's instructions.

The following examples are based on guidance from the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation. Both agencies have indicated that Other Support should include all resources made available to a researcher in support of and/or related to all of an individual’s research endeavors. We recommend researchers disclose relationships with foreign entities regardless of sponsor. We also advise researchers to follow the guidance below for all federal agencies and to pay close attention to any agency-specific instructions for preparing other support documents. Guidance from federal agencies is evolving and may change over time.

Examples of activities that should be reported include:

• Selection to or participation in a foreign “talents” or similar type of program, whether compensated or uncompensated.
• Domestic and foreign grants and contracts, whether provided through UW-La Crosse, another institution, or to the researcher directly.
• Financial support for laboratory personnel (e.g., students, postdocs, or scholars working in a researcher’s lab at UW-La Crosse and who are supported by a foreign or domestic entity either through salary, stipend, or receipt of living or travel expenses). (This would not include individuals who are paid directly by UW-La Crosse.)
• Provision of in-kind research support by another institution, foreign or domestic, including lab space, equipment, supplies, and employee time.
• Any agreement with a foreign university for which the UW-La Crosse faculty member directs non-UW students, postdocs, or other research personnel affiliated with that university.
• Any contractual agreement with a foreign institution/company or foreign government agency.
• Any non-UW-La Crosse agreement in which foreign funds or other resources are provided to the faculty for activities either at UW-La Crosse or at a foreign institution.
• Consulting agreements, whether formally contracted or informally agreed to, and whether or not they are for compensation, with foreign or domestic entities, governments, companies, universities, etc.

Yes. Other Support includes foreign and domestic research collaborations that directly benefit the researcher’s research endeavors.

Yes, report visiting scholars on Other Support if a visiting scholar contributes to the individual’s research endeavors.

No. We believe the faculty member’s time has already been taken into account and no additional effort should be attributed to hosting a visiting scholar.

1. In the instance where a visiting scholar spends time with the UWL PI and the visit is not related to a grant or contract, then the UWL PI is being paid from UWL sources.
2. In the second instance, where the visitor and the UWL PI are engaged in activities that relate to a sponsored grant or contract, the PI’s effort on the project is either being paid by the project or cost-shared by UWL.

Yes. For example, participation in a foreign talent program needs to be reported as Other Support even if not directly related to the scope of work on federally-funded awards.

No. Hosting foreign individuals for non-research purposes, such as visits by foreign dignitaries, consular officials, and visits relating to international academic exchange programs, are not considered Other Support. Such visits may need to be flagged for other reasons, for example, to ensure compliance with export control regulations.

• Before the professor and students visit, it is recommended you contact Business Services to determine if they are coming from a restricted organization or country. This can affect what the visitors can do on campus or where they can visit. 
• If the visit is likely to result in scientific collaborations or publications, you should include these scholars on future Other Support documents. 
• If you host the visitors as part of your UWL activities, the visit is for academic or outreach purposes, and no data will be exchanged in the course of the visit, there is nothing to report as Other Support. 

If the grant funding to visit the other country is run through UWL, this funding should be included on your Other Support documents. 

However, if the funds for the collaboration are paid to you directly, or the other institution is paying directly for the travel, then you should report this on any Significant Financial Interest (SFI) Disclosure Form you complete for extramural funding and identify the outside funding source. The funds may also need to be included on Other Support. 

NIH may likely consider such a collaboration to be a foreign component, defined as “the performance of any significant scientific element or segment of a project outside of the United States, either by the recipient or by a researcher employed by a foreign organization, whether or not grant funds are expended.” Activities that meet this definition may include:

• collaborations with investigators at a foreign site anticipated to result in co-authorship;
• use of facilities or instrumentation at a foreign site; or
• receipt of financial support or resources from a foreign entity.

If the activity meets the definition of foreign component, one of the following actions will be required:

• If you are submitting a new or competitive renewal application to the NIH, see the applicable application instructions for the Research & Related (R&R) Other Project Information Form, in part 6.
• If you are proposing a new foreign component mid-project for an ongoing NIH award, it may be appropriate to either:
  • Propose the new foreign involvement in your Research Performance Progress Report or
  • Submit a prior approval request through ORSP. Prepare a letter explaining the relationship and route it to ORSP. ORSP will then submit the request to the funding NIH Institute/Center for action.